1.
Prognostic Value of Troponins in Patients With or Without Coronary Heart Disease: Is it Dependent on Structure and Biology?
Lippi, G, Cervellin, G, Sanchis-Gomar, F
Heart, lung & circulation. 2020;(3):324-330
Abstract
Convincing evidence has emerged that cardiac troponins (cTns) T and I are the biochemical gold standard for diagnosing cardiac injury, and may also be used as efficient screening and risk stratification tools, especially when measured with the new high-sensitivity (hs-) immunoassays. In this narrative review, we aim to explore and critically discuss the results of recent epidemiological studies that have attempted to characterise the prognostic value of cTns in patients with or without cardiovascular disease, and then interpret this information according to cTn biology. Overall, all recent studies agree that higher blood levels of cTns reflect the larger risk of cardiovascular events and/or death, both in the general population and in patients with cardiovascular disease. Additional evidence has shown that the clinical information provided by assessment of both cTns molecules is greater compared to that of either protein alone, and this is mostly due to differential metabolism and clearance of cTnI and cTnT after release in the bloodstream. Although it seems likely that the prognostic value of these biomarkers may be higher than that of other conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as cholesterol or C reactive protein, large and reliable cost-effectiveness investigations are needed to define whether cTns-based population screening may be biologically plausible, clinically effective and economically sustainable.
2.
Utility of traditional circulating and imaging-based cardiac biomarkers in patients with predialysis CKD.
Colbert, G, Jain, N, de Lemos, JA, Hedayati, SS
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2015;(3):515-29
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Cardiac biomarkers, such as cardiac troponin T (cTnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal-pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP), are commonly used to diagnose acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure exacerbation in symptomatic patients. Levels of these biomarkers are frequently chronically elevated in asymptomatic patients with ESRD who are receiving maintenance dialysis. Other imaging biomarkers commonly encountered in nephrologists' clinical practice, such as coronary artery calcium measured by computed tomography, left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid intima-media thickness, are also frequently abnormal in asymptomatic patients with ESRD. This article critically reviews the limited observational data on associations between cTnT, BNP, NT-pro-BNP, coronary artery calcium, left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid intima-media thickness with cardiovascular events and death in non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD. Although sufficient evidence suggests that these biomarkers may be used for prognostication, the diagnostic utility of cTnT, BNP, and NT-pro-BNP remain challenging in patients with CKD. Decreased renal clearance may affect the plasma levels of these biomarkers, and upper reference limits were originally derived in patients without CKD. Until better data are available, higher cutoffs, or a rise in level compared with previous values, have been proposed to help distinguish acute myocardial infarction from chronic elevations of cTnT in symptomatic patients with CKD. Additionally, it is not known whether these biomarkers are modifiable and amenable to interventions that could change hard clinical outcomes in patients with CKD not yet undergoing long-term dialysis.